Talk:Wp/ine/G̑erəneriskom dn̥g̑ʰᵘ̯am

Content
To all those saying what I wrote was a fictional conlang, I was simply using this and this. Reiskom is a coined term for "Swedish". The language I referring to is Old Norse. -EggSalt (talk) 12:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * G̑erlom Su̯ebʰiskom is proper name for Kingdom of Sweden. Carlos Quiles sites are unreliable, contrary to Kobler/Pokorny. These sites are breaking spelling norms from:
 * http://www.koeblergerhard.de/idgwbhin.html
 * http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/ielex/PokornyMaster-X.html
 * AA (talk) 12:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and how do we interpret names like "helki" or "þorkautr". I didn't see what was wrong with using Hēlgʷi and Dʰorqātʷ -EggSalt (talk) 12:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that PIE according to Carlos Quiles is flawed, see real Alphabet. AA (talk) 12:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hēlgʷi and Dʰorqātʷ do not exist in Kobler and Pokorny, no ʷ there, so I repeated their reconstruction according to Kobler and Pokorny. AA (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Also why did you remove my changes Dǫnsk tunga is the name of G̑erlos Reiskos in Old Norse, which is the language I am talking about.
 * I see "Dǫnsk tunga" means Danish Tongue. It turns that Old Norse people called themselved Danish people. AA (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Is this page about Old Norse or about the Stenkvista runestone? --U̯elk̑elmos·INE (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Old Norse, and the Stenkvista runestone is an example of written Old Norse. -EggSalt (talk) 13:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it is about first ever Norse King. AA (talk) 13:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It is definitely Old Norse, or at least what I had intended to say in the article was that but it was probably changed. -EggSalt (talk) 14:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * But "G̑erlos" is cognate to Charles. And Charles was Frankish king. AA (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Isn't the title supposed to be G̑erlom Reiskom as "-m" is for non-living things? --U̯elk̑elmos·INE (talk) 01:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * G̑erlom Su̯ebʰiskom would be the best for Kingdom of Sweden, since EggSalt etymologically confused Sweden and Russia. AA (talk) 07:05, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

The original word in the title "G̑erlos" was meant to mean "old". Furthermore, "Reiskos" was a coined term for "Swedish" based off Finnish "Ruotsi". The page was supposed to be about Old Norse. -EggSalt (talk) 08:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * In PIE we should match cognates, we must not use borrowed words. Otherwise we will cease to have pure PIE language. Users should see real PIE, without falsifications. AA (talk) 09:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Having a pure PIE is like having only using Old English words in English, no French or Old Norse or what not. Þen I ƿould speake a kin to þis, and I woulde speake no Romanish or Francish ƿords. Speakinȝe a kin to þis is muche to harde for me, and evene in oþer tounȝes it is.
 * PIE must be pure since it was only language in its time, see Wp/ine/Pr̥mo·Sendʰro·U̯erokᵘ̯esi̯om. 81.88.49.54 15:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You are forgetting Proto Uralic, Proto Sino-Tibetan, and pre-Indo-European languages like Basque or Etruscan. Even Latin borrows from other languages. -EggSalt (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Read this, please. 81.88.49.27 15:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * So your only source is a potentially unreliable story that has NO support for its claim other than it′s self? -EggSalt (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

These stories are reliable, since things are being excavated on their basis, see House of the Virgin Mary. 81.88.49.35 15:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe this Mary you speak of had no magic powers and was just an ordinary person. Also a single house cannot justify your Tower of Babel story. -EggSalt (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Not maybe but really. Only devil has magic. Mary has miracles. Note that Bactrian, Zend, Indian and German can only descend from PIE. 81.88.49.28 15:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Can your Babel story explain why Basque and Etruscan are related to no other languages? -EggSalt (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * We should be graceful that God pointed us that PIE is original pre-Babel language. Some editors find cognates between PIE and such tongues, for example Sumerian gu descends from PIE *gᵘ̯ou-, it is even listed in Pokorny. 81.88.49.35 15:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Gu could be a loan, like in Etruscan Taliθa is borrowed from Aramaic -EggSalt (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I always manage to find cognate not loan when reconstructing nation names in Wp/ine/Leizdom U̯ik̑īpē̆di̯ā. Even China Japan and Korea. AA (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

In PIE those confounded loans are totally unneeded. Even Tieng Viet Nam can be cognatized to Dn̥g̑ʰu̯ām U̯elneroiskom. 81.88.49.33 16:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Show then how Tieng Viet Nam is cognatised to Dn̥g̑ʰu̯ām U̯elneroiskom. -EggSalt (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It is simply because Tieng = Dn̥g̑ʰu̯ā- = Tongue, Viet = U̯el- = Walk, Nam = Nero- = Inner, while both sounding and meaning coincide at once. 81.88.49.50 16:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay then, any more cognates to show me? -EggSalt (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Father: PIE appas = hebrew abba, Mother: PIE amma = hebrew imma. 81.88.49.5 16:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Now please explain this: аав нь (Áv ni) Mongolian for father. Tell me how it is related to "pətēr-". -EggSalt (talk) 16:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * This is related not to pətēr-os but to appa-no-s. Note that Mongolian in turn resembles modern Av- form of old Ab- form in Hebrew. 81.88.49.34 16:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)